| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 7530U vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906eb
Core
Barcelo-R
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2023
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
192.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
24.89k (x2.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
21.82k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
4.83k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
8.63k (x1)
TOTAL
31.96k
60.16k (x1.88)

Multithread

7530U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
89.4k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
81.19k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
18.06k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
4.24k (x0.84)
TOTAL
171.39k
192.88k (x1.13)

Performance/W
7530U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
7530U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4