Ryzen 5 7530U vs 3400G
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.2 times faster than the 7530U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Barcelo-R
Picasso
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
14.58k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
23.98k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
5.35k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
6.34k (x0.73)
TOTAL
31.96k
50.25k (x1.57)
Multithread
7530U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
57.37k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
107.03k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
28.9k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
7.05k (x1.4)
TOTAL
171.39k
200.34k (x1.17)
Performance/W
7530U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4