Ryzen 5 7530U vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 2.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 2.3 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Barcelo-R
Dali
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
30.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
76.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
8.68k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
16.03k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
3.5k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
2.76k (x0.32)
TOTAL
31.96k
30.97k (x0.97)
Multithread
7530U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
21.73k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
40.56k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
9.77k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
3.96k (x0.79)
TOTAL
171.39k
76.01k (x0.44)
Performance/W
7530U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
1449 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
2704 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
651 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
5068 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
4581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
8849 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4