Ryzen 5 7530U vs Mobile 3020e
Description
The 7530U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3020e is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 3.3 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7530U gets a score of 171.4 k points while the 3020e gets 52.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7530U is 3.3 times faster than the 3020e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
820f01
Core
Barcelo-R
Dali
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/2
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.96k points
29.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
171.39k points
52.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7530U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
8.81k
9.28k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
10.18k
14.56k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.31k
3.44k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.66k
2.06k (x0.24)
TOTAL
31.96k
29.34k (x0.92)
Multithread
7530U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
55.98k
15.75k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
76k
28.63k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.38k
5.87k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.04k
2.17k (x0.43)
TOTAL
171.39k
52.42k (x0.31)
Performance/W
7530U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
3732 points/W
2625 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5066 points/W
4771 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2292 points/W
979 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
336 points/W
361 points/W
TOTAL
11426 points/W
8737 points/W
Performance/GHz
7530U
3020e
Test#1 (Integers)
1957 points/GHz
3570 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2262 points/GHz
5602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1925 points/GHz
792 points/GHz
TOTAL
7103 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4