Ryzen 5 5625U vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 4.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406f1
Core
Barcelo
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/28
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2022
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
17.8k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
16.51k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
4.47k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
2.56k (x0.13)
TOTAL
70.65k
41.35k (x0.59)
Multithread
5625U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
494.82k (x5.33)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
514.13k (x4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
132.87k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
20.8k (x4.06)
TOTAL
281.26k
1162.63k (x4.13)
Performance/W
5625U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4