Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i7-4702MQ
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.9 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 1.9 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306c3
Core
Barcelo
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /8
TDP
15 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2022
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
145.15k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
18.98k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
9.5k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
4.32k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
3.99k (x0.19)
TOTAL
70.65k
36.8k (x0.52)
Multithread
5625U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
74.75k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
47.72k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
19.65k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
3.02k (x0.59)
TOTAL
281.26k
145.15k (x0.52)
Performance/W
5625U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4