| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ea
Core
Barcelo
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2022
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
352.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
29.17k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
25.49k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
5.84k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
13.15k (x0.64)
TOTAL
70.65k
73.65k (x1.04)

Multithread

5625U

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
166.66k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
146.9k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
34.04k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
5.25k (x1.02)
TOTAL
281.26k
352.84k (x1.25)

Performance/W
5625U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4