Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i5-10210Y
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10210Y is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i5-10210Y gets 81.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 5625U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-10210Y. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806ec
Core
Barcelo
Comet Lake-Y
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1377
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
44.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
81.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
17.9k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
15.89k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
3.58k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
6.78k (x0.33)
TOTAL
70.65k
44.15k (x0.62)
Multithread
5625U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
33.78k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
34.63k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
8.09k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
5.29k (x1.03)
TOTAL
281.26k
81.79k (x0.29)
Performance/W
5625U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
4826 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4947 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1155 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
756 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
11684 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
i5-10210Y
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
4476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
895 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
1694 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
11037 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4