Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.7 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.7 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a40f41
Core
Barcelo
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
21.04k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
22.41k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
10.21k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
24.27k (x1.18)
TOTAL
70.65k
77.93k (x1.1)
Multithread
5625U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
158.65k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
215.86k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
89.45k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
14.77k (x2.88)
TOTAL
281.26k
478.73k (x1.7)
Performance/W
5625U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4