| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
Both models 5625U and 5800H are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.5 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a50f00
Core
Barcelo
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2022
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
20.37k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
22.52k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
10.18k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
21.49k (x1.05)
TOTAL
70.65k
74.56k (x1.06)

Multithread

5625U

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
144.01k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
191.86k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
84.53k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
6.5k (x1.27)
TOTAL
281.26k
426.9k (x1.52)

Performance/W
5625U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4