| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i9-13900KS


Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900KS is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i9-13900KS gets 1708.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900KS is 6.1 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b0671
Core
Barcelo
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
15 W
150 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
127.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
1708.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
57.69k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
33.34k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
17.55k (x1.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
18.76k (x0.92)
TOTAL
70.65k
127.35k (x1.8)

Multithread

5625U

i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
757.76k (x8.16)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
626.83k (x4.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
294.93k (x5.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
29.05k (x5.67)
TOTAL
281.26k
1708.56k (x6.07)

Performance/W
5625U
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
5052 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
4179 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1966 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
194 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
11390 points/W

Performance/GHz
5625U
i9-13900KS
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
9616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
2925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
3127 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
21226 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4