Ryzen 5 5625U vs Core i3-12100T
Description
The 5625U is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5625U gets a score of 281.3 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-12100T is 1.2 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90675
Core
Barcelo
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1140-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
70.65k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
281.26k points
330.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5625U
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.57k
43.24k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
22.03k
23.76k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.55k
12.67k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.5k
13.88k (x0.68)
TOTAL
70.65k
93.54k (x1.32)
Multithread
5625U
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
92.92k
150.28k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
128.4k
126.29k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.82k
45.32k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.13k
8.73k (x1.7)
TOTAL
281.26k
330.62k (x1.18)
Performance/W
5625U
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6194 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
8560 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3654 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
342 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
18750 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
5625U
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4318 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5124 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2221 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4768 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
16431 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4