Ryzen 5 5600X vs Core i7-7820HQ
Description
The 5600X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.2 times faster than the i7-7820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
906e9
Core
Vermeer
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
86.03k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.05k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600X
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.28k
23.23k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.58k
20.13k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
4.57k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.45k
7.92k (x0.31)
TOTAL
86.03k
55.85k (x0.65)
Multithread
5600X
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
135.28k
85.54k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
180.56k
87.07k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.27k
20.37k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.94k
3.57k (x0.09)
TOTAL
435.05k
196.55k (x0.45)
Performance/W
5600X
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2081 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2778 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
599 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6693 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600X
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
5061 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2548 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5533 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
18702 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4