Ryzen 5 5600X vs Core i5-12400
Description
The 5600X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 5600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600X gets a score of 435.1 k points while the i5-12400 gets 544.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400 is 1.3 times faster than the 5600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f10
90672
Core
Vermeer
Arder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
86.03k points
102.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
435.05k points
544.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
23.28k
48.08k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.58k
25.6k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.72k
14.02k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.45k
14.81k (x0.58)
TOTAL
86.03k
102.51k (x1.19)
Multithread
5600X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
135.28k
230.14k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
180.56k
198.07k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80.27k
94.78k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.94k
21.64k (x0.56)
TOTAL
435.05k
544.64k (x1.25)
Performance/W
5600X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
2081 points/W
3541 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2778 points/W
3047 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1235 points/W
1458 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
599 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6693 points/W
8379 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600X
i5-12400
Test#1 (Integers)
5061 points/GHz
10927 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5562 points/GHz
5819 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2548 points/GHz
3186 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5533 points/GHz
3365 points/GHz
TOTAL
18702 points/GHz
23298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4