Ryzen 5 5600H vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
50657
Core
Cezanne
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
16.86k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
12.08k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.37k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
6.29k (x0.42)
TOTAL
53.37k
38.61k (x0.72)
Multithread
5600H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
150.99k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
118.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
33.44k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8.6k (x2.25)
TOTAL
255.19k
311.57k (x1.22)
Performance/W
5600H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4