Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
306f2
Core
Cezanne
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
15360 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
18.64k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
10.55k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.12k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
2.54k (x0.17)
TOTAL
53.37k
35.86k (x0.67)
Multithread
5600H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
181.66k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
122.09k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
47.02k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
7.22k (x1.89)
TOTAL
255.19k
357.99k (x1.4)
Performance/W
5600H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4