Ryzen 5 5600H vs N100
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the gets 88.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.9 times faster than the . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b06e0
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-N
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1264
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
36.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
88.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
15.23k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
11.04k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.54k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
4.98k (x0.33)
TOTAL
53.37k
36.79k (x0.69)
Multithread
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
37.07k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
32.57k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
14.75k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.9k (x1.02)
TOTAL
255.19k
88.29k (x0.35)
Performance/W
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
6178 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
5429 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
649 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
14715 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
3247 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1631 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1464 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
10821 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4