Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i9-9900K
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
32.08k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
28.17k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
6.68k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
14.98k (x1)
TOTAL
53.37k
81.91k (x1.53)
Multithread
5600H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
242.98k (x2.91)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
220.16k (x1.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
53.97k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
12.22k (x3.19)
TOTAL
255.19k
529.32k (x2.07)
Performance/W
5600H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4