| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i7-8665U


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-8665U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-8665U gets 123.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-8665U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806ec
Core
Cezanne
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
41.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
123.09k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
16.92k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
15.41k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.33k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
6k (x0.4)
TOTAL
53.37k
41.66k (x0.78)

Multithread

5600H

i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
53.19k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
52.4k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
11.67k (x0.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.83k (x1.52)
TOTAL
255.19k
123.09k (x0.48)

Performance/W
5600H
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
3546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
3493 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
778 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
389 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
8206 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
i7-8665U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3525 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
3210 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
694 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
8680 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4