| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i7-6500U


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-6500U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-6500U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.6 times faster than the i7-6500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
406e3
Core
Cezanne
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
kB
Date
February 2021
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
46.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
97.52k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
19.47k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
17.58k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.05k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
5.15k (x0.34)
TOTAL
53.37k
46.25k (x0.87)

Multithread

5600H

i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
42.05k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
40.2k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
9.4k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.86k (x1.53)
TOTAL
255.19k
97.52k (x0.38)

Performance/W
5600H
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
2803 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2680 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
626 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
391 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
i7-6500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6279 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5672 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1305 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1662 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
14918 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4