Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-9600K
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.5 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
February 2021
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
77.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
372.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
30.64k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
26.75k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
6.33k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
14.03k (x0.94)
TOTAL
53.37k
77.75k (x1.46)
Multithread
5600H
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
174.92k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
153.88k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
35.93k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
8k (x2.09)
TOTAL
255.19k
372.74k (x1.46)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
378 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
3924 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6661 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
16902 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4