Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.6 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806e9
Core
Cezanne
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2021
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
97.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
19.34k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
17.47k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.08k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
4.04k (x0.27)
TOTAL
53.37k
44.94k (x0.84)
Multithread
5600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
42.86k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
41.3k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
9.69k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.68k (x0.96)
TOTAL
255.19k
97.52k (x0.38)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
6501 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4