Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 4.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
40651
Core
Cezanne
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
57.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
13.79k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
7.79k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.11k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
2.72k (x0.18)
TOTAL
53.37k
27.41k (x0.51)
Multithread
5600H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
28.78k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
18.99k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
7.21k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
2.6k (x0.68)
TOTAL
255.19k
57.58k (x0.23)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4