Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0653
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
302.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
25.16k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
22.28k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.18k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
11.97k (x0.8)
TOTAL
53.37k
64.6k (x1.21)
Multithread
5600H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
144.86k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
120.98k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
32.55k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.73k (x0.98)
TOTAL
255.19k
302.13k (x1.18)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4