Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-10200H
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0652
Core
Cezanne
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
26.37k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
23.91k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.57k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
11.68k (x0.78)
TOTAL
53.37k
67.53k (x1.27)
Multithread
5600H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
114.08k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
114.71k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
27.33k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.25k (x1.11)
TOTAL
255.19k
260.38k (x1.02)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4