| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs 3500U


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3500U is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 3500U gets 141 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.8 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Cezanne
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
36.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
140.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
10.88k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
18.09k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.29k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
3.36k (x0.22)
TOTAL
53.37k
36.64k (x0.69)

Multithread

5600H

3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
42.44k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
73.82k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
20.76k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.96k (x1.03)
TOTAL
255.19k
140.97k (x0.55)

Performance/W
5600H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
2829 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
4921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
1384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
9398 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
3500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
2942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
4890 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
909 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
9901 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4