| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs 2400G


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f10
Core
Cezanne
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
198.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
14.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
23.23k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.35k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
5.18k (x0.35)
TOTAL
53.37k
47.96k (x0.9)

Multithread

5600H

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
58.24k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
105.72k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
28.73k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.59k (x1.46)
TOTAL
255.19k
198.27k (x0.78)

Performance/W
5600H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4