Ryzen 5 5600H vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 3250U gets 76 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.4 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Cezanne
Dali
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
30.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
76.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
8.68k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
16.03k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.5k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
2.76k (x0.18)
TOTAL
53.37k
30.97k (x0.58)
Multithread
5600H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
21.73k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
40.56k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
9.77k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.96k (x1.03)
TOTAL
255.19k
76.01k (x0.3)
Performance/W
5600H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1449 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2704 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
651 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
5068 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
4581 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1000 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
8849 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4