Ryzen 5 5600H vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f81
Core
Cezanne
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
14.48k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
23.84k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.43k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
5.46k (x0.37)
TOTAL
53.37k
49.21k (x0.92)
Multithread
5600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
54.39k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
88.77k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
20.04k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
5.48k (x1.43)
TOTAL
255.19k
168.69k (x0.66)
Performance/W
5600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4