Ryzen 5 5600H vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 3.6 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
810f10
Core
Cezanne
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2021
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
71.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
10.73k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
18.15k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.99k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
3.89k (x0.26)
TOTAL
53.37k
36.77k (x0.69)
Multithread
5600H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
20.11k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
36.87k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
10.74k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.31k (x0.86)
TOTAL
255.19k
71.02k (x0.28)
Performance/W
5600H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4