| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600H vs A12 9800


Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600H is 2.5 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
660f51
Core
Cezanne
Bristol Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
kB
Date
February 2021
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
100.79k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
13.42k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
17.61k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
3.77k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
3.06k (x0.2)
TOTAL
53.37k
37.86k (x0.71)

Multithread

5600H

9800
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
40.46k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
43.18k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
12.78k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
4.37k (x1.14)
TOTAL
255.19k
100.79k (x0.39)

Performance/W
5600H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
1551 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600H
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4