Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i7-12700
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 2.7 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 2.7 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90672
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/20
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25600 kB
Date
February 2021
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
698.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
48.39k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
26.92k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
13.37k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
15.34k (x1.03)
TOTAL
53.37k
104.01k (x1.95)
Multithread
5600H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
415.67k (x4.97)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
158.57k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
109.37k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
14.72k (x3.85)
TOTAL
255.19k
698.34k (x2.74)
Performance/W
5600H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
10744 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4