Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i5-1235U
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1235U is 1.2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906a4
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
297.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
36.73k (x2.56)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
22.09k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
11.24k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
11.58k (x0.77)
TOTAL
53.37k
81.64k (x1.53)
Multithread
5600H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
130.18k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
110.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
50.76k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
6.31k (x1.65)
TOTAL
255.19k
297.46k (x1.17)
Performance/W
5600H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
19831 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4