Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 2 times faster than the 5600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
a0671
Core
Cezanne
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
February 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
32.55k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
26.95k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
10.76k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
19.32k (x1.29)
TOTAL
53.37k
89.58k (x1.68)
Multithread
5600H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
232.06k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
203.56k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
72.89k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.81k (x1)
TOTAL
255.19k
512.32k (x2.01)
Performance/W
5600H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4