Ryzen 5 5600H vs Core i3-1125G4
Description
The 5600H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-1125G4 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600H gets a score of 255.2 k points while the i3-1125G4 gets 241 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600H is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1125G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806c1
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP6
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2021
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
53.37k points
56.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
255.19k points
241.03k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600H
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
14.34k
22.63k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
17.67k
17.36k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
8.89k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
7.37k (x0.49)
TOTAL
53.37k
56.25k (x1.05)
Multithread
5600H
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
83.58k
103.42k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
119.22k
102.39k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.56k
32.17k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
3.05k (x0.8)
TOTAL
255.19k
241.03k (x0.94)
Performance/W
5600H
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1857 points/W
3694 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2649 points/W
3657 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1079 points/W
1149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
85 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
5671 points/W
8608 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600H
i3-1125G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3413 points/GHz
6116 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4207 points/GHz
4691 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1527 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3560 points/GHz
1992 points/GHz
TOTAL
12707 points/GHz
15203 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4