| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i9-14900K


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-14900K is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i9-14900K gets 1756.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-14900K is 5.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
b0671
Core
Cezanne
Raptor Lake-
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2021
October 2023
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
137.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
1756.59k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
63.55k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
32.3k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
18.92k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
22.61k (x1.01)
TOTAL
79.76k
137.37k (x1.72)

Multithread

5600G

i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
813.87k (x7.23)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
608.32k (x3.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
313.09k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
21.31k (x1.86)
TOTAL
345.64k
1756.59k (x5.08)

Performance/W
5600G
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
6511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
4867 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
2505 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
170 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
14053 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i9-14900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
10591 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5383 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
3153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
22895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4