| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i5-9600KF


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.1 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ec
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
371.08k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
30.52k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
26.54k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
6.41k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
13.87k (x0.62)
TOTAL
79.76k
77.34k (x0.97)

Multithread

5600G

i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
174.66k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
154.06k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
34.11k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
8.24k (x0.72)
TOTAL
345.64k
371.08k (x1.07)

Performance/W
5600G
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3906 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4