| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
706e5
Core
Cezanne
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2021
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
23.2k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
21.2k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
9.4k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
11.54k (x0.51)
TOTAL
79.76k
65.35k (x0.82)

Multithread

5600G

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
94.68k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
103.38k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
35.79k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
9.33k (x0.81)
TOTAL
345.64k
243.18k (x0.7)

Performance/W
5600G
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4