| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
800f82
Core
Cezanne
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2021
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
431.14k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
15.34k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
25.75k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
5.79k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
17.95k (x0.8)
TOTAL
79.76k
64.83k (x0.81)

Multithread

5600G

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
123.07k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
239.3k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
60.6k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
8.18k (x0.71)
TOTAL
345.64k
431.14k (x1.25)

Performance/W
5600G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
4106 points/W

Performance/GHz
5600G
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4