Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.2 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
90675
Core
Cezanne
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2021
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
33.85k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
20.33k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
10.51k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
11.77k (x0.52)
TOTAL
79.76k
76.46k (x0.96)
Multithread
5600G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
174.21k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
141.31k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
64.86k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
19.01k (x1.66)
TOTAL
345.64k
399.39k (x1.16)
Performance/W
5600G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600G
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4