Ryzen 5 5600G vs Core i9-11900KB
Description
The 5600G is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900KB is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.6 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600G gets a score of 345.6 k points while the i9-11900KB gets 537.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900KB is 1.6 times faster than the 5600G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a50f00
806d1
Core
Cezanne
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2021
July 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.76k points
63.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
345.64k points
537.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600G
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
22.16k
24.09k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.46k
19.54k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
8.48k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.44k
11.68k (x0.52)
TOTAL
79.76k
63.79k (x0.8)
Multithread
5600G
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
112.5k
220.79k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
153.92k
225.98k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.75k
79.1k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.47k
11.32k (x0.99)
TOTAL
345.64k
537.18k (x1.55)
Performance/W
5600G
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
1731 points/W
3397 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2368 points/W
3477 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1042 points/W
1217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
177 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5318 points/W
8264 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600G
i9-11900KB
Test#1 (Integers)
5036 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5558 points/GHz
3988 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2434 points/GHz
1730 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5099 points/GHz
2384 points/GHz
TOTAL
18128 points/GHz
13018 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4