Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i9-10900K
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.6 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.6 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0655
Core
Vermeer
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
20480 kB
Date
March 2022
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
685.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
32.67k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
28.49k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
6.53k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
12.72k (x0.51)
TOTAL
83.79k
80.41k (x0.96)
Multithread
5600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
307.39k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
298.47k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
72.94k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
6.85k (x0.18)
TOTAL
429.25k
685.65k (x1.6)
Performance/W
5600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
5485 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4