Ryzen 5 5600 vs 3400G
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 2.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 2.1 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
810f81
Core
Vermeer
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2022
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
14.58k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
23.98k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
5.35k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
6.34k (x0.25)
TOTAL
83.79k
50.25k (x0.6)
Multithread
5600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
57.37k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
107.03k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
28.9k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
7.05k (x0.18)
TOTAL
429.25k
200.34k (x0.47)
Performance/W
5600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4