Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
b0671
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2022
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
1763.08k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
58.6k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
33.29k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
17.77k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
19.49k (x0.78)
TOTAL
83.79k
129.15k (x1.54)
Multithread
5600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
804.04k (x5.99)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
613.45k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
311.08k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
34.5k (x0.9)
TOTAL
429.25k
1763.08k (x4.11)
Performance/W
5600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4