Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 446.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 446.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90675
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
83.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
446.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
37.53k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
22.25k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
11.34k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
12.44k (x0.5)
TOTAL
83.79k
83.57k (x1)
Multithread
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
196.67k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
157.42k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
72.51k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
20.03k (x0.52)
TOTAL
429.25k
446.62k (x1.04)
Performance/W
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
1681 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
3817 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
8531 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5057 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
2577 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
2828 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
18992 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4