Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 1.1 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
90672
Core
Vermeer
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2022
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
87.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
488.01k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
38.79k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
23.73k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
11.95k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
13.41k (x0.54)
TOTAL
83.79k
87.88k (x1.05)
Multithread
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
203.66k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
182.98k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
83.88k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
17.49k (x0.46)
TOTAL
429.25k
488.01k (x1.14)
Performance/W
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
2815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
7508 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
8815 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5394 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
2715 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
3048 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
19972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4