Ryzen 5 5600 vs Core i9-11900K
Description
The 5600 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.7 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5600 gets a score of 429.2 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-11900K is 1.7 times faster than the 5600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0671
Core
Vermeer
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2022
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.79k points
101.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
429.25k points
748.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5600
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.73k
36.08k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
30.19k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.44k
12.96k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
25.03k
21.88k (x0.87)
TOTAL
83.79k
101.11k (x1.21)
Multithread
5600
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
134.28k
311.76k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
178.56k
314.01k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
78.16k
112.23k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
38.26k
10.02k (x0.26)
TOTAL
429.25k
748.02k (x1.74)
Performance/W
5600
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2066 points/W
2494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
2512 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/W
898 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
589 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
6604 points/W
5984 points/W
Performance/GHz
5600
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5166 points/GHz
6807 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5695 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2599 points/GHz
2446 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5688 points/GHz
4129 points/GHz
TOTAL
19043 points/GHz
19077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4