| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 261.9 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
706e5
Core
Lucienne
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
53.76k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
261.91k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.63k
21.5k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23k
17.71k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.62k
7.92k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.51k
8.24k (x1.27)
TOTAL
53.76k
55.37k (x1.03)

Multithread

5500U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
90.38k
73.03k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
118.74k
68.19k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.39k
24.89k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.4k
5.54k (x1.26)
TOTAL
261.91k
171.65k (x0.66)

Performance/W
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6025 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7916 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3226 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
294 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
17461 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3908 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5750 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2156 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1628 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13441 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4