| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 266.8 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 190.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f81
706e5
Core
Lucienne
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2021
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.51k points
59.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
266.8k points
190.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.6k
23.05k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
23.2k
18.7k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.68k
8.66k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
8.81k (x1.25)
TOTAL
54.51k
59.23k (x1.09)

Multithread

5500U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
93.64k
80.69k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
119.89k
75.49k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
48.47k
28.18k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.8k
5.87k (x1.22)
TOTAL
266.8k
190.23k (x0.71)

Performance/W
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6243 points/W
5379 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7993 points/W
5033 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3232 points/W
1879 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
320 points/W
391 points/W
TOTAL
17787 points/W
12682 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3901 points/GHz
6403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5799 points/GHz
5195 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2170 points/GHz
2406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1756 points/GHz
2448 points/GHz
TOTAL
13626 points/GHz
16453 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4