Ryzen 5 5500U vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 257.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.8 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 257.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 4.8 times faster than the 5500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
50657
Core
Lucienne
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
March 2021
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.23k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.24k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
29.53k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.53k
22.59k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.37k
5.99k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.46k
10.22k (x1.58)
TOTAL
52.23k
68.33k (x1.31)
Multithread
5500U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
87.91k
587.06k (x6.68)
Test#2 (FP)
116.93k
496.41k (x4.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.64k
134.66k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
22.99k (x4.82)
TOTAL
257.24k
1241.12k (x4.82)
Performance/W
5500U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5861 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7795 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3176 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
318 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
17149 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3717 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5633 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2092 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1615 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
13057 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4