Ryzen 5 5500U vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The 5500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 257.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500U gets a score of 257.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.5 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f81
810f81
Core
Lucienne
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.23k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.24k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
14.48k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
22.53k
23.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.37k
5.43k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.46k
5.46k (x0.85)
TOTAL
52.23k
49.21k (x0.94)
Multithread
5500U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
87.91k
54.39k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
116.93k
88.77k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.64k
20.04k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.48k (x1.15)
TOTAL
257.24k
168.69k (x0.66)
Performance/W
5500U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5861 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7795 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3176 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
318 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
17149 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
5500U
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3717 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5633 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2092 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1615 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13057 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4